CertiHomescommutingcost.com
A Certihomes · True Lifestyle Cost report

Losing Ground, fourteen years on

Housing, transportation, and the monthly cost of keeping the lights, water and connection on now consume two-thirds of a moderate-income budget. The squeeze didn't ease since CNT's 2012 study — it hardened, and opened a third front.

H + T + U927 metros analyzed118.7M householdsMeasured, not modeled
67.1%
True Lifestyle Cost — housing + transportation + utilities as a share of a typical moderate-income budget, nationally
97.4%
of U.S. households live in metros where housing + transportation alone exceeds the 45% affordability line
23.9%
Transportation is the swing cost — the second-largest line after housing, and the one families can actually move
24/25
of the 25 largest metros are unaffordable for moderate-income households on housing + transportation alone
Executive summary

The 45% line is now the exception, not the rule

We applied the Housing + Transportation Affordability Index to all 927 U.S. metros — 118.7M households — then layered a rebuilt 2026 utility baseline (energy, water, garbage, connectivity) and replaced CNT's modeled transportation with our measured multimodal cost engine. Nationally the True Lifestyle Cost lands at 67.1% of a moderate-income budget. The most-burdened large metros are Miami, Riverside, Tampa, Orlando, Los Angeles.

measured (our proprietary multimodal cost algorithm) for 24 of 30 metros; H+T Index modeled for the 6 without precompute

The 30 largest metros
#MetroMod. incomeHTH+TU/moH+T+U
1Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach$56,14342%23%66%$60679.0%
2Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario$64,86337%27%64%$63975.8%
3Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater$53,92536%24%60%$59573.2%
4Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford$57,07735%26%61%$57573.1%
5Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim$72,49041%20%61%$71072.8%
6San Antonio-New Braunfels$55,80833%26%59%$63672.7%
7Cleveland-Elyria$53,64631%24%55%$69470.5%
8San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad$76,80039%20%59%$70570.0%
9Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land$63,53033%23%56%$68368.9%
10Detroit-Warren-Dearborn$58,44231%24%55%$63067.9%
11Pittsburgh$57,65429%24%54%$65167.5%
12Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington$65,61434%22%55%$63266.6%
13Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta$65,50031%23%54%$68866.6%
14Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia$61,86330%24%55%$59466.5%
15St. Louis$60,26729%24%53%$66266.2%
16Cincinnati$60,69228%24%52%$67365.3%
17Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro$72,13034%20%53%$66864.1%
18Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler$64,76531%23%54%$53964.0%
19Kansas City$63,52629%23%52%$63664.0%
20New York-Newark-Jersey City$77,04737%15%53%$68163.6%
21Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington$67,33233%19%51%$67263.0%
22Chicago-Naperville-Elgin$68,66833%19%52%$60662.6%
23Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown$75,01132%19%51%$68662.0%
24Boston-Cambridge-Newton$87,88834%16%50%$78860.8%
25Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue$86,05633%18%51%$67860.5%
26Baltimore-Columbia-Towson$77,31731%18%49%$68159.6%
27Denver-Aurora-Lakewood$77,27232%18%50%$54658.5%
28Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington$75,46829%19%48%$61257.7%
29San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley$100,70734%15%48%$69556.3%
30Washington-Arlington-Alexandria$94,24731%15%45%$69953.9%

Source: H/T ratios — CNT H+T Index (2022 ACS). U — rebuilt 2026 national utility baseline. Transportation measured by the CommutingCost multimodal engine. Rows shaded are severely burdened (H+T+U ≥ 70%).